<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernson&#039;s Rebounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>Nope,

They didnt&#039; get it right in 2005 either.  Way off just 9 months earlier:

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={D3D1A1BD-BBF5-44C9-87EE-8506093F4F73}&amp;siteId=yhoo

and

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?column=Resident+Authority&amp;siteid=yhoo&amp;dist=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope,</p>
<p>They didnt&#8217; get it right in 2005 either.  Way off just 9 months earlier:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=</a>{D3D1A1BD-BBF5-44C9-87EE-8506093F4F73}&amp;siteId=yhoo</p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?column=Resident+Authority&#038;siteid=yhoo&#038;dist" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?column=Resident+Authority&#038;siteid=yhoo&#038;dist</a>=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M.</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>John M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>Jan-Martin &amp; MikeC -

The conference call operator announced the &lt;em&gt;Mission Impossible&lt;/em&gt; disclaimer at the end: &lt;em&gt;&quot;this webcast will self-destruct in 30 days.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Unless &lt;em&gt;Wayback&lt;/em&gt; has last year&#039;s, or someone saved it, we can&#039;t do comparisons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan-Martin &#038; MikeC -</p>
<p>The conference call operator announced the <em>Mission Impossible</em> disclaimer at the end: <em>&#8220;this webcast will self-destruct in 30 days.&#8221;</em> Unless <em>Wayback</em> has last year&#8217;s, or someone saved it, we can&#8217;t do comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>Twist,
Agreed that the graphs make no sense.

I wonder, did they release these kinds of &quot;forecasts&quot; a year ago, about 2006?
I&#039;m willing to be it&#039;d be a good laugh to see how &quot;accurately&quot; they predicted things a year ago, when everybody and his dog (esp in the media) still believed the market would rise forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twist,<br />
Agreed that the graphs make no sense.</p>
<p>I wonder, did they release these kinds of &#8220;forecasts&#8221; a year ago, about 2006?<br />
I&#8217;m willing to be it&#8217;d be a good laugh to see how &#8220;accurately&#8221; they predicted things a year ago, when everybody and his dog (esp in the media) still believed the market would rise forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan-martin feddersen</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>jan-martin feddersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/09/fannie-re-turnaround-07/#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>hello,

very good pdf. overly optimistic.......

they expect 3 rate cuts in 2007. this could only happen when the economy is in a recession. the main case for thier &quot;strong housing market&quot; is and has always been the stong economy and the strong jobsmarket.

this is inconsistent. it would be nice to see the pdf from the year earlier prediction.....

i´m sure that every calculation they have made was also to optimistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,</p>
<p>very good pdf. overly optimistic&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>they expect 3 rate cuts in 2007. this could only happen when the economy is in a recession. the main case for thier &#8220;strong housing market&#8221; is and has always been the stong economy and the strong jobsmarket.</p>
<p>this is inconsistent. it would be nice to see the pdf from the year earlier prediction&#8230;..</p>
<p>i´m sure that every calculation they have made was also to optimistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

