<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bubble Bloggers Post Away- Bubble Blogs Not Liable for Libel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mspencer</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>mspencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/22/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>This is a good thing; its same as a home owner getting sued for a racially offensive graffiti posted on his house by a passer-by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good thing; its same as a home owner getting sued for a racially offensive graffiti posted on his house by a passer-by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twist</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/22/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>NVMike-

Probably should have added, &quot;She said fasciciously.&quot; We live in a society where we can sue for nearly anything.  With luck they won&#039;t prevail when it&#039;s determined it&#039;s not justified- but life and our court system offer no guarantees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NVMike-</p>
<p>Probably should have added, &#8220;She said fasciciously.&#8221; We live in a society where we can sue for nearly anything.  With luck they won&#8217;t prevail when it&#8217;s determined it&#8217;s not justified- but life and our court system offer no guarantees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M.</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>John M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/22/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>NVMike -

Point taken.  I&#039;ve often noticed that journalism is a bit like bicycle racing.  Once one source breaks a story, a great pack of other sources will immediately follow, &lt;em&gt;drafting&lt;/em&gt; as it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NVMike -</p>
<p>Point taken.  I&#8217;ve often noticed that journalism is a bit like bicycle racing.  Once one source breaks a story, a great pack of other sources will immediately follow, <em>drafting</em> as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NVmike</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/23/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>NVmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2006/11/22/bubble-blogs-not-liabel-for-libel/#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So go ahead- post away. John and I can sleep nights knowing the REIC can’t sue. Let’m have it.&lt;/i&gt;

Careful! You can still be sued.

As the article states: &quot;people who claim they were defamed in an Internet posting can seek damages from the original source of the statement.&quot;

If you write something defamatory and you&#039;re not merely repeating something like a snippet of a news article from the AZ Republic, you are potential defendant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So go ahead- post away. John and I can sleep nights knowing the REIC can’t sue. Let’m have it.</i></p>
<p>Careful! You can still be sued.</p>
<p>As the article states: &#8220;people who claim they were defamed in an Internet posting can seek damages from the original source of the statement.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you write something defamatory and you&#8217;re not merely repeating something like a snippet of a news article from the AZ Republic, you are potential defendant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

