<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicago Fed Fails to &quot;Prove&quot; Subprime Containment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotSoFunnyMoney</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator>NotSoFunnyMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5934</guid>
		<description>Containment to Sub-prime?

Over the last couple of days I&#039;ve seen both CDO/mortgage-backed securities as well as corporate bond offerings cancelled, postponed or significantly lowered in offering size; Blackstone has been crashing since it&#039;s IPO, and Bear Stearns&#039; (and other&#039;s) CDO &quot;toxic waste&quot; offerings have been scrapped; credit default swaps (indicationg corporate default probability) are rising across the board; even emerging market country debt is down sharply...

The CDO/mortgage-backed market currently is in freefall. Even the lowest &quot;investment grade&quot; segment(BBB-) is in complete freefall, reaching significant new lows just yesterday. The BBB- -index is down 40 % over the last six months, and 15 % over the last month to less then 55 cents to the dollar. ( http://www.markit.com/information/affiliations/abx/history )

Apparently the MSM, Fed and rating agencies all took the same PR-course David Lereah did.

I can  only assume that they are very freightened by the chaos that could ensue should they all start speaking the truth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Containment to Sub-prime?</p>
<p>Over the last couple of days I&#8217;ve seen both CDO/mortgage-backed securities as well as corporate bond offerings cancelled, postponed or significantly lowered in offering size; Blackstone has been crashing since it&#8217;s IPO, and Bear Stearns&#8217; (and other&#8217;s) CDO &#8220;toxic waste&#8221; offerings have been scrapped; credit default swaps (indicationg corporate default probability) are rising across the board; even emerging market country debt is down sharply&#8230;</p>
<p>The CDO/mortgage-backed market currently is in freefall. Even the lowest &#8220;investment grade&#8221; segment(BBB-) is in complete freefall, reaching significant new lows just yesterday. The BBB- -index is down 40 % over the last six months, and 15 % over the last month to less then 55 cents to the dollar. ( <a href="http://www.markit.com/information/affiliations/abx/history" rel="nofollow">http://www.markit.com/information/affiliations/abx/history</a> )</p>
<p>Apparently the MSM, Fed and rating agencies all took the same PR-course David Lereah did.</p>
<p>I can  only assume that they are very freightened by the chaos that could ensue should they all start speaking the truth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twist</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5933</link>
		<dc:creator>twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5933</guid>
		<description>Sandman-

I think it&#039;s like when an epidemic strikes.  The greatest fatalities are usually among the very young, the very old, and the infirm- that doesn&#039;t mean that everyone else is immune though.

You are right, prime borrowers are less likely to end up upside down on their mortgage.  Once they are though, they become vulnerable as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandman-</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s like when an epidemic strikes.  The greatest fatalities are usually among the very young, the very old, and the infirm- that doesn&#8217;t mean that everyone else is immune though.</p>
<p>You are right, prime borrowers are less likely to end up upside down on their mortgage.  Once they are though, they become vulnerable as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandman</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5932</link>
		<dc:creator>sandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2007/06/30/chicago-fed-fails-to-prove-subprime-containment/#comment-5932</guid>
		<description>These &quot;experts&quot; have an amazing ability to not see the next obvious step in this crash.  The reason subprime was hit first is because they had little to no skin in the game.  Prices come down slightly, they move to being underwater, so they bail.

Now take a prime borrower and wait another year or so until they&#039;re underwater.  You expect them to act differently?  Why?  Aren&#039;t prime borrowers supposed to be the &quot;smarter&quot; bunch?  Wouldn&#039;t the smart decision be to walk away and not overstretch yourself to hold a declining asset?

It&#039;s just incredible how often &quot;experts&quot; have denied the next logical step in this, only to have it come true.  Yet they retain full credibility in the MSM, who readily believe their next denial.  It&#039;s actually quite sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These &#8220;experts&#8221; have an amazing ability to not see the next obvious step in this crash.  The reason subprime was hit first is because they had little to no skin in the game.  Prices come down slightly, they move to being underwater, so they bail.</p>
<p>Now take a prime borrower and wait another year or so until they&#8217;re underwater.  You expect them to act differently?  Why?  Aren&#8217;t prime borrowers supposed to be the &#8220;smarter&#8221; bunch?  Wouldn&#8217;t the smart decision be to walk away and not overstretch yourself to hold a declining asset?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just incredible how often &#8220;experts&#8221; have denied the next logical step in this, only to have it come true.  Yet they retain full credibility in the MSM, who readily believe their next denial.  It&#8217;s actually quite sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

