<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Las Vegas:  If There&#039;s No Demand for BLM Land, Why Sell It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: manfre</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/#comment-8635</link>
		<dc:creator>manfre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/#comment-8635</guid>
		<description>Asset Hunter, I think item #1 sums it up best.

I wonder how the government is going to react when their tax receipts come in a good deal lower than in the go go days. I know in the Sacramento city and/or county government, they now have a hiring freeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asset Hunter, I think item #1 sums it up best.</p>
<p>I wonder how the government is going to react when their tax receipts come in a good deal lower than in the go go days. I know in the Sacramento city and/or county government, they now have a hiring freeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asset Hunter</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/#comment-8634</link>
		<dc:creator>Asset Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/2007/11/11/las-vegas-why-sell-blm-land/#comment-8634</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure where the money from the BLM land sales go, but regardless of who gets it to spend, here are a few possible theories:

1.  They&#039;ve become addicted to the income.

2.  Low prices are the Pine Sol &amp; Clorox to keep the party going.  (ie: college party out of beer)

3.  Several people&#039;s jobs at the auction company, the BLM, and several other organizations are completely dependent upon the transaction of that land (at any price.)

4.  The land doesn&#039;t actually belong to those people, and they are going to beat it like a rented mule to keep their jobs for a while longer.  (think of the college kids driving a &#039;rented&#039; car down to buy more beer late in the night)

5.  The BLM might be aware that if they don&#039;t sell now, at lower prices, that they will continue for many years to compete for &quot;customers&quot; with the very builders that they sold the adjacent land to in the last couple years, at the pompous &quot;above appraised price.&quot;

If the builders want to / need to dump it, the BLM could have created it&#039;s own desperate competition for land buying dollars for some time to come, and thereby violated theories # 1,2,3 &amp; 4 above.


Of course, it could just be an example of the Number 1 priority of any bureaucracy.

To protect the bureaucracy.

Number 2 rule:   Grow the bureaucracy by any means available.

I don&#039;t like the BLM much, though, so I&#039;m probably very biased.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where the money from the BLM land sales go, but regardless of who gets it to spend, here are a few possible theories:</p>
<p>1.  They&#8217;ve become addicted to the income.</p>
<p>2.  Low prices are the Pine Sol &amp; Clorox to keep the party going.  (ie: college party out of beer)</p>
<p>3.  Several people&#8217;s jobs at the auction company, the BLM, and several other organizations are completely dependent upon the transaction of that land (at any price.)</p>
<p>4.  The land doesn&#8217;t actually belong to those people, and they are going to beat it like a rented mule to keep their jobs for a while longer.  (think of the college kids driving a &#8216;rented&#8217; car down to buy more beer late in the night)</p>
<p>5.  The BLM might be aware that if they don&#8217;t sell now, at lower prices, that they will continue for many years to compete for &#8220;customers&#8221; with the very builders that they sold the adjacent land to in the last couple years, at the pompous &#8220;above appraised price.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the builders want to / need to dump it, the BLM could have created it&#8217;s own desperate competition for land buying dollars for some time to come, and thereby violated theories # 1,2,3 &amp; 4 above.</p>
<p>Of course, it could just be an example of the Number 1 priority of any bureaucracy.</p>
<p>To protect the bureaucracy.</p>
<p>Number 2 rule:   Grow the bureaucracy by any means available.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the BLM much, though, so I&#8217;m probably very biased.  <img src='http://housingdoom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

