Mort Zuckerman of U.S. News and World Report gave a gloomy assessment of the housing market yesterday:
How much longer will house prices keep falling? That collapse is a larger threat to our economic well-being than even the headline-grabbing problems of our increasingly frozen financial system. We’ve had half a century of rising home values, capped by an inflation-adjusted rise of 85 percent from 1997 to 2006. Now the loss of value tops $1 trillion, and the financial world has incurred hundreds of billions of dollars of losses on the premise that U.S. home prices would never fall. The median price of a new home is at $206,500, receding to where it was in November of 2003, thus wiping out more than three years of price appreciation. It takes 6.3 months to sell a finished home compared with 4.3 months a year ago. The ratio of inventory to sales is the highest since October 1981—there’s an unsold extra backlog of a million single-family homes and condominiums. Builders have cut their housing starts by approximately 40 percent over the past year. David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch estimates construction will fall from a million units to approximately 700,000 units, an all-time low since World War II.
House prices, though, haven’t fallen enough to tempt buyers, despite sales incentives and rebates. According to the Conference Board, fewer Americans plan to buy in the next six months than at any time since 1994. The decline in conventional mortgage rates has failed to spark sales because it has been trumped by tighter lending standards. Speculators, who helped fuel the bubble, have virtually disappeared from the market.
The rest of the article is also interesting, and he did a good job of discussing the problem of fighting a deflating bubble with lower interest rates:
Lower rates can help those with adjustable-rate mortgages, but they cannot stop the deflation of the housing bubble or prevent a tidal wave of mortgage defaults. This is partly because mortgage rates reflect the 10-year treasury bond yield more than the federal funds rate. That rate has dropped, but the spread of both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgages over treasuries has widened, which means smaller declines in mortgage rates. Then there are those many borrowers who got mortgages in 2003 and 2004 when the federal funds rate was 1 percent; they’re not going to get a better deal than that. And if they now have zero or negative equity in their home, they won’t be able to refinance in any event.
Zuckerman made this recommendation:
There is no time to delay in combating the trends. Monetary policy cannot make bad investments turn good. Cheaper mortgages won’t cure the market where properties are plunging so much in value. The collapse of value will affect all homeowners and, through them, the whole economy. It’s bound to be the most pressing issue in this presidential election year. Voters in the primaries and general election should look to candidates with credible policies in mind to address this downturn.
