In this evening’s Washington Post, Senator Johnny Isakson, (R-Ga) defends the proposed $7,000 tax credit:
I take exception to the assertion in the April 7 editorial "A Pro-Foreclosure Bill" that the $7,000 tax credit in the Senate housing measure will encourage home foreclosures.
I was in the real estate business for 33 years, and, believe me, no one wants a foreclosure. The banks know that it is an expensive, lengthy process.
Those living in that home certainly don’t want to vacate the home or have a foreclosure on their credit report.
The $7,000 tax credit for anyone who purchases a foreclosed home within a year of the proposal’s enactment will inspire qualified buyers to get off the sidelines and into the market. It will allow us to replace loan defaults with good mortgages, which will stabilize housing prices for all homeowners. It worked in 1975 when Congress passed a tax credit for home buyers, and it will work again today.
So how big was that 1975 tax credit?
In 1975, when there was almost a three-year supply of vacant houses on hand, lawmakers approved a $6,000 credit spread over three annual installments of $2,000 per year.According to the NAHB, that carrot brought enough buyers into the market that builders and their subcontractors were able to get back to work. Inventories fell and production doubled, taking the pressure off of housing prices.
So how does $7,000 today compare to the $6,000 break of 33 years ago?
According to data from the National Association of Homebuilders, in 1975, the median price of an existing home was $35,300, so $6,000 would have represented 17% of the purchase price. According to the NAR in 2007 however, the median price of existing homes was $219,000 so a $7,000 tax break would represent 3% of the purchase price. That hardly provides the same level of motivation that the 1975 tax break offered. A comparable tax break at today’s prices would be $37,230.