Op-Ed Friday: Banks Experiencing Subprime Losses

It’s Friday, and with mounting foreclosures and rumblings at Lehman Brothers, I couldn’t help but think that Doomers would enjoy this video:

We welcome your comments on subprime losses, or anything else housing related.

This thread’s for you!

 

Related Posts

  1. Op-Ed Friday: Will the job market come to this? (March 28, 2008)
    Tagged
  2. Op-Ed Friday- Winding Up The Year End (December 28, 2007)
    Tagged
  3. It's Op-Ed Friday- And Big Banks Will Save Us? (August 24, 2007)
    Tagged
  4. Banks to ask government to assume bad loan LOSSES (February 14, 2008)
    Tagged
  5. Op-Ed Friday is Black Friday (November 23, 2007)
    Tagged

Written by

More posts by:

14 Comments for this entry

  1. billydlight says:

    Twist and fellow doomers,
    If you want some comedy, I would encourage you google edra and tom blixseth to read about the failing yellowstone club

  2. AZSALUKI says:

    billydlight,

    It’s actually “tim” (you’ll get to the links quicker) blixseth.

    Thousands of acres of expensive land…..millions, if not billions of dollars involved…….multi million dollar houses……real estate investors AND wealthy celebrity types…….I CAN’T beleive they are having problems????? LOL

  3. John M. says:

    twist -

    Your sidebar find “Credit binge: Consumers drunk on debt [video]“ was bad enough, but the ad that came up before was for Somebody-or-other One Credit Cards — young couple goes to fancy restaurant, pays for expensive meal with credit card, but the meal was too small so they go to a convenience store and pay for a pile of junk food with the credit card. The hook is “write your own story.” (Igor says, “immoral” :( )

  4. agnostic says:

    I am still busy puking after reading that Lehman repurchased some shares – I don’t care how many or few – after using the Fed credit facility the way they have. Simply outrageous. Treasonous, even.

  5. John M. says:

    agnostic -

    Add to that the “Dark Pools of Liquidity,” 2008′s equity market’s version of the Tar Pits. Just watch where you step everyone :(

  6. metroplexual says:

    John are those “Dark Pools of Liquidity,” the mosquito infested pools I keep hearing about in backyards of foreclosed properties?

  7. John M. says:

    metro -

    No, it’s an explosion of off-exchange transactions by large institutional investors who don’t want the hoi palloi to realize they are quietly fleeing a stock.

    About a week ago stories on the trend virtually disappeared. Below is a rare one that discussed the issue today. When LEH bounced back on the NYSE the volume strangely collapsed. I’ve been wondering if the more interesting trades in the stock were occurring out of sight.

    “Industry Leaders Frown on Dark Pool Trend”, by Nina Mehta, TradersMagazine, June 6, 2008.

    Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, bucking a growing trend among the operators of dark pools, are vowing to stay pure. The two bulge-bracket shops tell Traders Magazine they have no intention of broadcasting out information about orders in MS Pool and Sigma X, their respective alternative trading systems. They say that occurs when electronic indications of interest are sent to third-party pools.

    “Sending indications out is something that removes the dark aspect of a dark pool,” said Andrew Silverman, head of electronic trading distribution at Morgan Stanley. He stressed that MS Pool, the broker’s dark pool for single stocks, does not send out indications on orders residing in the pool.

  8. hlowe says:

    Just think of future foreclosure rates if the fed decides to combat inflation. Many people have little knowledge of history and how their adjustible rate mortgage will be affected, resulting in their financial demise. Like Ed McManns wife, they will be praying.

  9. jryskmpr says:

    As I think I have said before, we are now seeing

    The Next Leg Down

    Oooooh! Here comes nasty old Depression, and the ghost of Andrew Mellon governing Washington, whispering, “Liquidate liquidate liquidate.”

    Which they WILL do.

    Economic activity is declining. It will CONTINUE TO DECLINE unless one thing is done:

    Ban housing evictions.

    This is the ONLY way to stave off a catastrophic depression.

    Now let’s see your idiosyncratic readers (many of whom have taken YEARS of home mortgage interest deductions–feeding heartily on “moral hazard”) weigh in with the “moral hazard” idiocy to say, “No no, it would be IMMORAL to ban housing evictions.”

    These are the PETIT BOURGEOIS fools who are, day by day, step by step, destroying the country. Hope they enjoy losing everything!

  10. JimAtLaw says:

    Darn right! Mandatory food rations, medical care, and air conditioned Cadillacs for all! No income, no problem!

    I’m damned tired of working, I want free rent and everything else, so jryskmpr, count me in for your proposal. Now just find some people to invest in buying and maintaining the house I get to live in for free, and I’ll be on easy street!

    Three cheers for banning all evictions! (But before you do, if you don’t mind, please let me know so I can move into a place with a pool and hot tub.)

  11. jryskmpr says:

    Edited- not in keeping with editorial standards

    T.

  12. freemonster says:

    jryskmpr,

    Do you by any chance play backgammon on the internet?

  13. JimAtLaw says:

    jryskmpr,

    The strength of your argument is well illustrated by your immediate resort to name calling personal attacks rather than logical discourse. Nonetheless, and what other people think notwithstanding, I’ll refrain from commenting on your posts in the future, and in any case, I’m sorry that you’re so filled with rage, and hope you feel better soon.

    Regards,
    Jim

  14. John M. says:

    John,

    I’ve taken the liberty of temporarily withdrawing your last complex piece so I can study it a bit closer. My head is already hurting with the Johnson / Mozillo caper (hope Bill Maloni has something to say on that at his blog soon), but at least that one touches on GSEs, so is somewhat on-topic for Doom.

    By the way, if I recall correctly you have some serious objections to Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Is there a link somewhere to your arguments? (this is not being facetious, back in ’74 I discovered that Cahn/Ingold/Prelog was unsound, so realize that conventional wisdom can be dead wrong no matter how well established; also gave serious consideration to Doug T. Ross’ idea that the empty set was not a good basis for mathematical foundations).

Comments are now closed.