Housing Doom

“He who defends everything defends nothing.” – Frederick the Great

November 5th, 2008

CMO into TBA gives COW

"… making CMOs eligible for the "to-be-announced" market — where generic issues are bought and sold before the bonds are actually delivered to investors — would lay additional supply on the market …" [you can say that again :( ]

Perhaps the golden age of financial engineering has not yet died. As reported by Reuters,[1] some bright light has seriously brought up the possibility of recycling Collatoralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) into the GSEs’ To-Be-Announced (TBA) market for MBS debt sales. TBA (see slides 56-57 here) is supposed to be for pristine prime mortgage paper so good that the debt buyer will sign up for it sight unseen. The idea of recycling the stuff in a CMO, which has already been sliced and diced, into this flow recalls the business model of the ruminant digestive system (hence the diagram above) and seems entirely inappropriate (to this blogger, anyway).

Robert L. Townsend has referred to things like this as "Pissing in the Soup."

About three months ago some bright souls proposed putting Jumbos into TBA. At the time Paul Jackson at HousingWire suggested this was a questionable business to say the least. This latest proposal fairly reeks of even more risk than the earlier idea.

Read the rest of this entry »

November 5th, 2008

Maloni: What Now for Fannie & Freddie?

"While Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as corporate entities may not be needed, their exclusive function as dedicated investors is needed to create and maintain the United States secondary mortgage market."

When I started looking at Fannie Mae back around 2002 or 2003 it was usually described as America’s largest non-bank financial institution. Perhaps that’s true in some ways even now, but it and its sibling Freddie Mac are on life support under new regulator FHFA’s conservatorship. To get an idea how extreme things have gotten, consider that Fannie’s market cap is now a bit less than a quarter of Hasbro’s.

From when the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) was founded by FDR in 1938 to when it was privatized in by LBJ 1968 (and subsequently given its quasi-competitor Freddie Mac in 1972 by Nixon) its guarantee on selected (mostly "conforming") American mortgage debt was backed by the full faith and credit of the Treasury. After 1968 this guarantee became implicit, but now that F&F have been ambiguously nationalized the strength of the guarantee is up in the air. What’s happening now, as it were, is an ongoing consolidation back onto Uncle Sam’s balance sheet of the off-balance-sheet deal FDR struck seventy years ago. Treasury doesn’t want to be responsible for all those bonds (it would approximately double America’s national debt) but alternatives to making the guarantee explicit aren’t obvious.

Bill Maloni’s recent post on the implications of Obama’s election includes some musings on how the new Administration might dispose of the GSEs, and Doom is happy to share his thoughts with our readers.

 


What Now for Fannie & Freddie?

by Bill Maloni

I hope that idea [in the original article Bill proposes forgiveness for some student loans - jm] fares better than my “Find a way to use Fannie and Freddie” to help with the Treasury’s not yet undertaken, “but I promise you soon to be,” massive mortgage backed security asset sales that the Treasury has promised us shortly will be forthcoming, once they give all of their Wall Street friends the jobs and opportunities to move those failed “private label” mortgage backed securities, meaning non-Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities.

In the meantime, Fannie and Freddie sit on their hands, waiting for Henry Paulson to state unequivocally if the former GSEs’ debt—as the Bush Administration advertised–is backed by the federal government, which should bring mortgage rates down, or is their debt “almost/nearly, a scosh/kinda/maybe” backed by the full faith and credit?

Confusion over this fact just makes the job tougher for everyone in the market.

Read the rest of this entry »

November 5th, 2008

Schiff: What Obama As President Means For The Economy

Here’s Peter Schiff yesterday on what he feels what having Obama as president means for the economy:

 

Read the rest of this entry »

November 5th, 2008

Vancouver, B.C.- How the mighty housing market has fallen

Once more, an "unsinkable" North American housing market is taking on water.  Home prices in Vancouver B.C. have dropped 8.8% since May:

 

VANCOUVER — Housing prices have fallen 8.8 per cent in the Vancouver area since May, according to new figures from the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver.

The overall residential benchmark price in the region in October was $518,668, the real estate board said in a release yesterday afternoon, down about $50,000 from $568,411 in May.

It is the latest official assessment that has declared the boom in the real estate market in Vancouver and British Columbia to be over for now.

Last week, the British Columbia Real Estate Association said the price of homes in Vancouver and the province peaked in the spring, and sales of existing homes were plunging, predicting a decline of about 30 per cent for this year compared with last year.

Two weeks ago, Central 1 Credit Union said housing prices in the province could fall as much as 20 per cent by 2010 from this year’s peak.

And it’s not just the detached housing market that’s hurting: Read the rest of this entry »

|