First it was the subprime loans that were causing problems for lenders. They were followed by the alt A loans. What is the latest problem child for lender is the formerly known as "insulated" prime jumbo loans: [Parenthetical comments are by author "Tradermark", not me.]
Rising defaults by affluent homeowners are raising the specter of another cloud over banks and investors, which could get stuck with thousands of expensive homes. About 6.9% of prime "jumbo" loans were at least 90 days delinquent in December, according to LPS Applied Analytics, a mortgage-data research firm. The rate was up sharply from 2.6% a year earlier. (hmm, I wonder what happens a year from now when unemployment rate is far higher and savings depleted?)
•Jumbo mortgages average about $750,000 and can run as high as $5 million or more. More borrowers with such loans are being hit by layoffs that are spreading through practically every sector and pay level of the U.S. economy.
•Defaults on jumbo mortgages tend to result in especially steep losses for lenders, because pricier homes are tough to sell in the current market. (just hold out for 2nd half 2009 when the recovery happens - should be easy to sell then)
•Last month, the mounting defaults prompted Moody’s Investors Service to downgrade hundreds of tranches of prime jumbo loans sold to investors as securities. Moody’s has downgraded more than 75% of all prime jumbo loans originated in 2006 and 2007 that carried the top rating of triple-A. (oh, Moody’s - where do I even start with these ratings agencies…)
•From 2002 to 2006, banks originated an average of $557 billion a year in jumbo loans, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication.
So will problems with jumbos be as bad as subprime? Some are saying it will be worse. Why?











