SIPC Subterfuge? Primex Pentagram? Ponzi Paranoia Running Amok

The Securities Investor Protection Corp. is seeking data on clients’ withdrawals from as far back as they can remember, that could lay groundwork for clawbacks. [1]

Holy revictimization, Batman!  Did SIPC just go through an exercise in mailing out 8,000-odd sheets of fly-paper?  Looks like the big-time, long term Madoff investors who retained a large balance at the end but took significant withdrawals over the years have some heavy cost-benefit analysis ahead of them:

Of course, investors who prefer to disappear into the weeds need not file the form. But those wishing to make a claim for lost funds, and to get up to $500,000 per account from SIPC, must fill in the blanks and file their forms.

“The one absolute truth is that if a claimant does not submit a claim form to the Trustee, there is absolutely no possibility of any future distribution,” said Stephen Harbeck, president and chief executive of SIPC.

 


UPDATE: Just when you thought this story-arc couldn’t get any weirder, it gets weirder.[4]

Bernie Madoff’s investment fund may never have executed a single trade, industry officials say, suggesting detailed statements mailed to investors each month may have been an elaborate mirage in a $50 billion fraud.


Meanwhile, Madoff is truly starting to look like The Fraud That Ate Everybody.™ Now some companies are suspect because they didn’t invest in the scheme.[2]

For the past two decades, Wall Street watchers could count on four U.S. firms to land in the middle of every securities scandal. From Nasdaq price fixing to fake research to rigging the IPO markets to peddling toxic subprime assets, one could rest assured that Citigroup’s Smith Barney, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs would be heading the lineup. Their complete absence from the greatest Ponzi scheme in history raises the question: what did they know and when did they know it?

The answer may reside in a pentagonal structure created in 1999 to serve the interests of a Wall Street cartel.

So, Doomers, do you suppose they were also into sacrificing small animals? Looks like something I’ll have to bring up with the gang at HSTC 2120 next week ;) Surely these guys who smelled a rat [3] have nothing to worry about, but you never know. The SEC didn’t follow up the leads they had, so who could possibly prove harm by people who didn’t blow the whistle?

—————-

[1]: "Feds put Madoff victims on hot seat", by Hilary Potkewitz, Crain’s New York, January 15, 2009.

[2]: "Wall Street Powerhouses Invested Alongside Madoff", by Pam Martens, CounterPunch, January 15, 2009.

[3]: "A few investors spotted Madoff’s red flags", by Elisabeth Butler Cordova, Crain’s New York, January 9, 2009.

[4]: "Madoff’s fund may not have made a single trade", by Jason Szep, Reuters, January 15, 2009.

Related Posts

  1. Go Magic Beans! SIPC's Gonna Get TARP'd (December 17, 2008)
    Tagged in Finance, Fraud

  2. We're All Ponzi Now: Cenbanks Feast on Treasuries as Flight from Agencies Continues (December 19, 2008)
    Tagged , , , in Federal Reserve, Finance, Fraud, Politics

  3. Madoff Bailout: First installment to be $15 billion? No, that was cars, but … (January 7, 2009)
    Tagged in Federal Reserve, Finance, Fraud, Politics

  4. Even a Fraud can be Too Big to Fail (January 4, 2009)
    Tagged in Fraud

  5. Op-ed Friday: Was whole economy a Ponzi scheme? (January 2, 2009)
    Tagged

Written by

More posts by:

4 Comments for this entry

  1. twist says:

    John-

    Did you see L’s pick on the sidebar from the MIT Blackjack team? They have an interesting take on the market and ponzi schemes as well.

  2. John M. says:

    twist -

    No I hadn’t seen it. Here’s the link for when it spins off the bar:

    “The Real Cause of the Financial Crisis: An MIT Blackjack Team Perspective”, by Semyon Dukach, Your Mortgage or Your Life, January 15, 2009.

    That’s a great article. In retrospect you can see just when that truck hit the quant hedgies — Thursday August 16, 2007, or just 4 days following the establishment of the Montreal Accord, if I’m reading this story correctly:

    “Hedge funds take more than a trim”, by James Quinn, Telegraph, August 21, 2007.

  3. Yossarian says:

    Great article by the Blackjack Team! (I remember them quite well).. This reminds me of two friends of mine who are ‘quants’ – one in finance, one in mathmatics. They have/had absolute fate in the numbers they liked.

    The numbers they didn’t like, they ignored. It’s a common human failing. Proven by some of the ‘softer’ neurological sciences.

    They both told me Phoenix real estate would never decline by more than a few percentage points… mere ‘instrument scatter’… they also told me that Phoenix population would continue to grow for the forseeable future.

    I think they’re both trying to figure out exactly why they were so completely wrong.

Comments are now closed.