<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 30 Percent of New Mexico Teachers Pension Fund&#039;s Value Evaporates in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/15/30-percent-of-new-mexico-teachers-pension-funds-value-evaporates-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/15/30-percent-of-new-mexico-teachers-pension-funds-value-evaporates-in-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/15/30-percent-of-new-mexico-teachers-pension-funds-value-evaporates-in-2008/#comment-15671</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=2035#comment-15671</guid>
		<description>it is SICk when institutions make millions insignificant.  In the scheme 10 million is insignificant.  In the scheme of 1 trillion giving 10 million to track Canada geese is insignificant.  This is the same ploy casinos use to transfer wealth, confuse the target and make the loss appear insignificant.

In my book, 100,000 is significant, 1,000,000 is more and 10,000,000 takes years of energy and effort to accumulate.   The presant path of spending is sickening....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is SICk when institutions make millions insignificant.  In the scheme 10 million is insignificant.  In the scheme of 1 trillion giving 10 million to track Canada geese is insignificant.  This is the same ploy casinos use to transfer wealth, confuse the target and make the loss appear insignificant.</p>
<p>In my book, 100,000 is significant, 1,000,000 is more and 10,000,000 takes years of energy and effort to accumulate.   The presant path of spending is sickening&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

