<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twice as Effective &amp; Twice as Sovereign: Fannie / Freddie Backstop Swells 100% to $400 billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/18/twice-as-effective-twice-as-sovereign-fannie-freddie-backstop-swells-100-to-400-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/18/twice-as-effective-twice-as-sovereign-fannie-freddie-backstop-swells-100-to-400-billion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/18/twice-as-effective-twice-as-sovereign-fannie-freddie-backstop-swells-100-to-400-billion/#comment-15718</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=2043#comment-15718</guid>
		<description>prepayment risk has been &quot;cooked in the price&quot; since 11/08.

Cost of closing loans has increased 100%.

Today, out of the blue, many lenders closed Private mortgage insurance.

This is scary: many lenders closed will not accept 740 ficos and 20% equity.  Regardless of what the govy wants, there has to be a buyer for this paper.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aoGAicgx.trY&amp;refer=us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prepayment risk has been &#8220;cooked in the price&#8221; since 11/08.</p>
<p>Cost of closing loans has increased 100%.</p>
<p>Today, out of the blue, many lenders closed Private mortgage insurance.</p>
<p>This is scary: many lenders closed will not accept 740 ficos and 20% equity.  Regardless of what the govy wants, there has to be a buyer for this paper.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#038;sid=aoGAicgx.trY&#038;refer=us" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#038;sid=aoGAicgx.trY&#038;refer=us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twist</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/02/18/twice-as-effective-twice-as-sovereign-fannie-freddie-backstop-swells-100-to-400-billion/#comment-15717</link>
		<dc:creator>twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=2043#comment-15717</guid>
		<description>John-

The officials must have consulted the Wall Street &quot;analysts&quot; who the MSM is always saying were shocked when this or that report comes in below &quot;expectations&quot;.

I&#039;m wondering if being &quot;expliciter&quot; will even help.&#160; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/18/obama-foreclosure-plan-business-washington-fannie-freddie.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I saw this comment in a Forbes article today:&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Lower interest rates obtained by refinancing could spark a wave of pre-payments on mortgages. That would spell bad news for investors who own mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the companies and who make money when rates are higher. &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&#8220;It may also have a detrimental effect on [mortgage-backed security] pricing because investors will be worried about prepayment,&#8221; says Guy Cecala, publisher of the trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance. In other words, it raises questions about who will buy the companies&#039; mortgage-backed securities. &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Taxpayers don&#039;t get off the hook either. &quot;At some point the government will have to take all the bad mortgages and [mortgage-backed securities] off the balance sheets of Fannie and Freddie,&quot; says Peter Wallison, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who has studied the mortgage buyers in detail. &quot;That&#039;s where the taxpayers will recognize the loss.&quot; At that point, he says, Congress will likely want to recreate the Fannie and Freddie as government-sponsored entities. &lt;/em&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The Obama administration may find that this doesn&#039;t work as well as they thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John-</p>
<p>The officials must have consulted the Wall Street &#8220;analysts&#8221; who the MSM is always saying were shocked when this or that report comes in below &#8220;expectations&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if being &quot;expliciter&quot; will even help.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/18/obama-foreclosure-plan-business-washington-fannie-freddie.html" rel="nofollow">I saw this comment in a Forbes article today:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>Lower interest rates obtained by refinancing could spark a wave of pre-payments on mortgages. That would spell bad news for investors who own mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the companies and who make money when rates are higher. </em></p>
<p><em>&ldquo;It may also have a detrimental effect on [mortgage-backed security] pricing because investors will be worried about prepayment,&rdquo; says Guy Cecala, publisher of the trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance. In other words, it raises questions about who will buy the companies&#8217; mortgage-backed securities. </em></p>
<p><em>Taxpayers don&#8217;t get off the hook either. &quot;At some point the government will have to take all the bad mortgages and [mortgage-backed securities] off the balance sheets of Fannie and Freddie,&quot; says Peter Wallison, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who has studied the mortgage buyers in detail. &quot;That&#8217;s where the taxpayers will recognize the loss.&quot; At that point, he says, Congress will likely want to recreate the Fannie and Freddie as government-sponsored entities. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Obama administration may find that this doesn&#8217;t work as well as they thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

