There’s a whole bunch of vacant REOs out there, and an ever growing number of homeless people. There are advocacy groups out there now who are helping the homeless become squatters: [Thanks L!]
MIAMI — When the woman who calls herself Queen Omega moved into a three-bedroom house here last December, she introduced herself to the neighbors, signed contracts for electricity and water and ordered an Internet connection.
What she did not tell anyone was that she had no legal right to be in the home.
Ms. Omega, 48, is one of the beneficiaries of the foreclosure crisis. Through a small advocacy group of local volunteers called Take Back the Land, she moved from a friend’s couch into a newly empty house that sold just a few years ago for more than $400,000.
While squatting is not legal, Take Back the Land operates in the open and works to have "responsible squatters":
Take Back the Land has had to compete with less organized squatters, said Max Rameau, the group’s director.
“We had a move-in that we were going to do one day at noon,” he said. “At 10 o’clock in the morning, I went over to the house just to make sure everything was O.K., and squatters took over our squat. Then we went to another place nearby, and squatters were in that place also.”
Mr. Rameau said his group differed from ad hoc squatters by operating openly, screening potential residents for mental illness and drug addiction, and requiring that they earn “sweat equity” by cleaning or doing repairs around the house and that they keep up with the utility bills.
“We change the locks,” he said. “We pull up with a truck and move in through the front door. The families get a key to the front door.” Most of the houses are in poor neighborhoods, where the neighbors are less likely to object.
This is a video interview on CNN with Rameau of Take Back the Land last December:
It seems like there should be a better way. There are homes that even the lenders don’t want, and folks who could really use a roof over their heads. It would be nice if there were a legal way to bring them both together.









I posted this on the 11th.
cpgone says:
April 11th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Squatters
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=12925208&ch=4226720&src=news
NO thanks to me?
Im so hurt. Who can I sue?
Laughs
CP -
Sorry that your contribution fell through the cracks
Doom’s a bit of a relay race and it would seem I fluffed the baton pass on that one.
CP-
I have a problem with a “right to housing”. I agree with the reporter- it isn’t fair to the neighbors who are paying to have squatters who don’t pay.
There are reports now though, of homes the banks won’t foreclose on. There are homes that the banks simply don’t want. Rather than an illegal squatter program, selling these homes at a minimal cost, or donating them to groups that charge a minimal rent could be a better approach than what is going on now.
Banks can’t police all the empty properties, making squatters a problem. Perhaps a tax break for donated homes to homeless groups might help solve several problems.
Ditto your comments twist.
The whole situation is very complicated and could merit a forum of its own.
Are we in Socialism?
Just kidding about suing.
Or was I ?
Laughs.
I was.
CP -
Wondering about your handle. You’re not one of the victims of Canada’s ABCP fiasco by any chance?
Yes we are in Socialism — specifically a command economy controlled by a committee of Wall Street IB lobbyists, no less. The coup took place just 7 years and 7 days after 9/11, but in the evening. At a closed door meeting on Capital Hill.
……………………………………………………
Doom V has lately started taking this organ of one of the more off-beat American religious factions pretty seriously. In this article, she sees them connecting some important dots between recent events in Europe (notably the G20 riots) and things like the above “Take Back the Land” initiative. Tomorrow’s Santelli astroturfing exercise is a neo-con joke, but it and Rameau’s much more serious effort could well be harbingers of things going completely out of control real fast if Obama doesn’t get his rear in gear right $#@% yesterday.
“Should Americans Prepare for a ‘Summer of Rage’?”, by Robert Morley, The Trumpet, April 14, 2009.
Twist,
Those properties that banks do not want are nearly always properties that need extensive work just to be habitable. I have never heard of a habitable home not being foreclosed on. Anywhere.
An inhabitable home is more expensive than a rental… as basic services must be assured by law in most states… you know those anti-slumlord laws. It used to be that lenders would turn these over to the local municipalities, but the municipalities don’t even want them… this would happen in places like Detroit.
What these people are doing is in other places like Florida where there is simply a glut at present price points. The only way to resolve that glut is to drop the price.
Everything can find a buyer; or in other words, there is nothing price can’t fix.
Chuck Ponzi
John M wrote.
“You’re not one of the victims of Canada’s ABCP fiasco by any chance”
No I am not aware of this fiasco.
Thanks for the Celente article.
I search for his vids. on YT.