Ginnie Mae has become a high volume subprime lender

Meet the newest massive subprime lender- Ginnie Mae: [Hat tip Freedom's Phoenix]

Much to their dismay, Americans learned last year that they “owned” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Well, meet their cousin, Ginnie Mae or the Government National Mortgage Association, which will soon join them as a trillion-dollar packager of subprime mortgages. Taxpayers own Ginnie too.

Only last week, Ginnie announced that it issued a monthly record of $43 billion in mortgage-backed securities in June. Ginnie Mae President Joseph Murin sounded almost giddy as he cheered this “phenomenal growth.” Ginnie Mae’s mortgage exposure is expected to top $1 trillion by the end of next year—or far more than double the dollar amount of 2007. (See the nearby table.) Earlier this summer, Reuters quoted Anthony Medici of the Housing Department’s Inspector General’s office as saying, “Who would have predicted that Ginnie Mae and Fannie Mae would have swapped positions” in loan volume?

Ginnie’s mission is to bundle, guarantee and then sell mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which is Uncle Sam’s home mortgage shop. Ginnie’s growth is a by-product of the FHA’s spectacular growth. The FHA now insures $560 billion of mortgages—quadruple the amount in 2006. Among the FHA, Ginnie, Fannie and Freddie, nearly nine of every 10 new mortgages in America now carry a federal taxpayer guarantee.

Herein lies the problem. The FHA’s standard insurance program today is notoriously lax. It backs low downpayment loans, to buyers who often have below-average to poor credit ratings, and with almost no oversight to protect against fraud. Sound familiar? This is called subprime lending—the same financial roulette that busted Fannie, Freddie and large mortgage houses like Countrywide Financial.

On June 18, HUD’s Inspector General issued a scathing report on the FHA’s lax insurance practices. It found that the FHA’s default rate has grown to 7%, which is about double the level considered safe and sound for lenders, and that 13% of these loans are delinquent by more than 30 days. The FHA’s reserve fund was found to have fallen in half, to 3% from 6.4% in 2007—meaning it now has a 33 to 1 leverage ratio, which is into Bear Stearns territory. The IG says the FHA may need a “Congressional appropriation intervention to make up the shortfall.”

Is anyone else getting a feeling of deja vu?

Related Posts

  1. Ginnie Mae Eliminates $417,000 cap on Veteran's Mortgages (August 29, 2007)
    Tagged
  2. Subprime Grief: Now Entering Stage Three – Negotiation (April 18, 2007)
    Tagged , , , in Federal Reserve, Finance, Los Angeles Market

  3. Fannie and Freddie to Buy "Tens of Billions" of Subprime Loans (September 10, 2007)
    Tagged ,
  4. Fannie and Freddie on life support- and liable to stay that way for awhile (May 19, 2009)
    Tagged , in Federal Reserve, Finance

  5. The FDIC: Another "Predatory" Lender? (July 22, 2008)
    Tagged

Written by

More posts by:

2 Comments for this entry

  1. malthus says:

    Oh goody. The politicians have crafted a new series for this season’s political theater.

    Is it a comedy? “The Pinko Panther”

    Is it an adventure tale? “Gullible’s Travels”

    Maybe it qualifies as a horror story. “Return of the Subprime Slime”

    Whatever the story line, we already know how it ends–don’t we?

  2. Tobby says:

    Nothing really new here. Technically GNMA is guaranteed by the FHA (insurance) which, of course, is in turn backed by us taxpayers. The losses flow to FHA (and us)if/when these defaults escalate as expected in 2010.

    GNMA actually makes money above and beyond the discount paid to FHA for loans. Not enough to offset the expected losses, but a good 120 basis points on loans securitized.

Comments are now closed.