<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Foreclosure Shadow Is Growing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingdoom.com/2009/09/29/the-foreclosure-shadow-is-growing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/09/29/the-foreclosure-shadow-is-growing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimAtLaw</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/09/29/the-foreclosure-shadow-is-growing/#comment-17463</link>
		<dc:creator>JimAtLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=4653#comment-17463</guid>
		<description>It absolutely could HousingStorm - especially since no politician wants a material second leg on their watch, and the banks simultaneously do not want to book losses.

Unfortunately, a side effect of this is that the most irresponsible buyer who bought a home in 2005 and is now not paying the mortgage often gets to stay for free for potentially years in a house that is more than he can afford, while those of us who were responsible end up in lesser accommodations and paying substantially for them.  Can you say &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;moral hazard&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?

I also find it particularly ironic that the Democrats controlling the House, Senate, and White House, while calling themselves champions of the poor and underprivileged, are fighting hard to keep housing prices elevated to benefit the rich and upper middle class along with their campaign donors, the banks and the NAR, at the clear expense of the bottom 40% who are paying rent and whose rents would fall if housing prices were allowed to correct to the levels they would without government intervention.  Champions of the poor indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It absolutely could HousingStorm &#8211; especially since no politician wants a material second leg on their watch, and the banks simultaneously do not want to book losses.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, a side effect of this is that the most irresponsible buyer who bought a home in 2005 and is now not paying the mortgage often gets to stay for free for potentially years in a house that is more than he can afford, while those of us who were responsible end up in lesser accommodations and paying substantially for them.  Can you say <i><b>moral hazard</b></i>?</p>
<p>I also find it particularly ironic that the Democrats controlling the House, Senate, and White House, while calling themselves champions of the poor and underprivileged, are fighting hard to keep housing prices elevated to benefit the rich and upper middle class along with their campaign donors, the banks and the NAR, at the clear expense of the bottom 40% who are paying rent and whose rents would fall if housing prices were allowed to correct to the levels they would without government intervention.  Champions of the poor indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HousingStorm</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/09/29/the-foreclosure-shadow-is-growing/#comment-17462</link>
		<dc:creator>HousingStorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=4653#comment-17462</guid>
		<description>The problem we&#039;re facing is that it&#039;s now been 13 months (in CA at least) of various foreclosure moratoriums. It begs the quesion: will the PTB ever allow the tsunami of foreclosures to hit?

One theory is that it&#039;s not in the banks&#039; best interest to foreclose with the current accounting rules. And, if they don&#039;t, then who does? I&#039;m concerned this could linger for a decade

&lt;a href=&quot;http://housingstorm.com/2009/09/whats-the-real-reason-that-banks-arent-foreclosing/&quot; title=&quot;What’s the real reason that banks aren’t foreclosing?&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem we&#8217;re facing is that it&#8217;s now been 13 months (in CA at least) of various foreclosure moratoriums. It begs the quesion: will the PTB ever allow the tsunami of foreclosures to hit?</p>
<p>One theory is that it&#8217;s not in the banks&#8217; best interest to foreclose with the current accounting rules. And, if they don&#8217;t, then who does? I&#8217;m concerned this could linger for a decade</p>
<p><a href="http://housingstorm.com/2009/09/whats-the-real-reason-that-banks-arent-foreclosing/" title="What’s the real reason that banks aren’t foreclosing?" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: multifamily</title>
		<link>http://housingdoom.com/2009/09/29/the-foreclosure-shadow-is-growing/#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator>multifamily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingdoom.com/?p=4653#comment-17461</guid>
		<description>To see Laurie Goodman&#039;s entire report from Amherst, go here:

http://multifamilyinvestor.com/exclusive-how-did-she-come-up-with-seven-million/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see Laurie Goodman&#8217;s entire report from Amherst, go here:</p>
<p><a href="http://multifamilyinvestor.com/exclusive-how-did-she-come-up-with-seven-million/" rel="nofollow">http://multifamilyinvestor.com/exclusive-how-did-she-come-up-with-seven-million/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

