This one cannot pass unremarked, and I see over at HuffyPo Hugh McGuire has already remarked: "It's hard to swallow an article made up almost exclusively of quotes from various other thinkers, about how dangerous mash-ups are."
With your indulgence I'm going to shift into Dvorak DSK and just vent until the old blood pressure returns to something resembling normal.
Obviously the following is a preliminary response, and I'll need to reflect further before mounting a more definitive defence. Meanwhile, Doomers would do well to read the Crown's complete set of accusations here …
NYT "Texts Without Context"
… these authors’ books are nuanced ruminations on some of the unreckoned consequences of technological change — books that stand as insightful counterweights to early techno-utopian works like Esther Dyson’s “Release 2.0” and Nicholas Negroponte’s “Being Digital,” which took an almost Pollyannaish view of the Web and its capacity to empower users.
So first of all, Mr. Sulzberger, here's a hearty greeting from one of those amateur empowered users who's been busy turning your old business model into custard these last few years. Frankly, there would have been no need for us to have invaded your turf if you'd continued to cover the ground as you did from your founding. Your minions can pour scorn on us all day long, but until you start getting down and dirty with ground truth again without fear that you will offend a corporate or government source you'll continue to have difficulties in the area of credibility.
Now Kakutani's article isn't all that outstanding, it's just the usual extended series of disjointed appeals to emotion supporting established authority against low-wattage challenge that constitutes most of the editorial (and now "blogging") content in the MSM. It just stands out more in a long casual pre-review piece for several books she may or may not dig into later. And I happen to be having a bad hair day up here.
